Introducing the pronunciation chart at beginner level

A question from Kathryn Irwin

Hello Adrian, I just wondered if you have any tips or advice about introducing the chart to beginner or elementary level students? What kinds of activities would you recommend in the first few lessons?

I understand that you prioritise the physicality of making the individual sounds over teaching the symbols themselves but surely students also need to come to grips with which  sounds are represented by each symbol, if you know what I mean. This can seem a little overwhelming to students in the beginning, especially to those who do not have a Roman script, such as Arabic, Chinese or Korean learners.

Something which I also find challenging with any level of class is the fact that in my current teaching situation I get a new class of students every 4 weeks and, even at higher levels, some students may never have seen the phonemic chart before whilst others are very familiar with it and can recognise any transcriptions I write on the board. I just wondered if you have any advice for dealing with this kind of situation where it is not possible to gradually build up a knowledge of the chart due to lack of continuity with the same class.

Hi Kat: There is a post on my blog on introducing the chart that gives a dozen different ways of doing it. Click here for that particular post. Here for example is no 7 from that post, introducing the chart with students’ names.

1.. Instead of using vocabulary items, ask students to say their own names, with an English pronunciation (as an English speaker might say it). You can help them.

2.. Ask each to count the number of sounds in their anglicised name

3.. And then to come to the pron chart and point out their name on the chart. Other students say the sounds as pointed

4.. This time of course everyone knows what sound the student is looking for, but still the same rules apply: the class say whatever is pointed at, wrong or right, while the person pointing does so silently, enabling them to hear what the class are saying and to correct themselves if necessary

Regarding learning symbols, look at it like this. The symbols are names (in this case visual) for an experience (which needs to be physical as well as auditory, or else it is not much of an experience). When you have the experience, ie the sense of a muscle posture coupled perhaps with a certain movement or release, and an acoustic sensation, then to name it (associate sound with the symbol) is easy. If however you don’t have the experience and you try to learn the symbol, you’re just at sea and confused, because you are trying to learn the name for an experience you don’t yet have.  If you try to learn the names of a new group of students before meeting them it is very difficult as there is no experience to which to attach the names. If however you meet them and get to know them then in due course to attach a name to your experience (of each individual person) is no longer a problem, in fact you welcome it since it gives a label for the experience which enables you to refer to this person, to remember and think about them.

In summary, all I’m saying is once you have the experience of a sound then to learn the symbol is free of charge. If you try to teach symbols without experience of the sound, which I never do nor ever have done, you and your students will get into a mess.

So, I don’t teach the chart, or the symbols. I think many teachers perhaps may go wrong here. What I do is to introduce the chart, or more accurately, put it into circulation, so that it is available as a tool, and pretty soon the students learn the symbols anyway through simply using them, but not through me teaching them.  But I don’t mind if the students never learn the symbols, That is not what it’s about.  The chart is a tool for discriminating sounds. It is the whiteboard of pron, that’s all.

And regarding phonetic symbols, you don’t need those particular symbols, it could be a colour or a number or an abstract mark, it doesn’t matter, but you need some kind of name for the sounds, just like you need a name for students in your class.  In English it cannot be a letter of the alphabet even if some of the symbols look like it! Of course in another language letters of the alphabet may work instead of phonemic symbols (eg Spanish). I have even used this same chart with no symbols, just empty boxes. And it works just as well! In this case students simply relate sounds to the location on the chart. But of course that doesn’t help them when they look in a dictionary!

Regarding rolling enrolment to your class, have a look at the tips here. Hopefully this will suggest some ideas to experiment with.

This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Introducing the pronunciation chart at beginner level

  1. Pingback: ‘Introducing the pronunciation chart at beginner level’ by Adrian Underhill | Rakesh Patel

  2. Beatriz says:

    Mr Underhill, is there any way to ask you privately about the summer courses where you’ll be teaching? Thanks in advance.

  3. Khan says:

    I love and am currently devouring everything you’ve put out on the internet. =D I am a teacher trainer and many of my workshops deal with pronunciation teaching and learning using phonemic symbols. I have always felt that the key to improving pronunciation is to become more aware of what is going on inside your mouth when you articulate sounds so your method was like the biggest AHA! moment I’ve had in ages! =) It’s makes perfect sense! I am totally as enthusiastic as the exclamation marks suggest! =)) Thank you for making all this information accessible. Can’t wait to get my hands on the book itself! =)

  4. Hi Khan
    Great to hear that you are working on this too. When you are ready tell us more about what you are doing.

  5. Khan says:

    I basically started out conducting phonetic workshops for teachers who were training children for the National Spelling Bee. Since this is a much neglected area here, we got a great response. I’ve been pronouncer for the spelling bee for several years and the experience taught me was just how essential pronunciation teaching is for our children. There are some super smart kids who will simply not process certain sounds because they have never heard them articulated like they do on the spelling bee stage. For instance, the voiceless /th/ sounds like /f/ to many or they’ll confuse /p/ with /b/ and /t/ with /d/, even when the /p/ and /t/ are aspirated. Our teachers hesitate approaching pronunciation teaching because they aren’t confident about their own pronunciation and feel they cannot be good models. Moreover, we have a love-hate relationship with the English language that really gets in the way of everything. =P

    Consonant articulation is easier to _show_ than vowel articulation (and the vowel diagram can be scary to the beginner!) which is why I LOVE your chart! It’s perfect. I only came across your work last year and now that I have discovered you blog, I can direct teachers to this!! Makes me so happy! 😀 And I definitely want to talk about your techniques. Unfortunately, youtube is banned here (Pakistan) or I could have directed teachers to your videos.

  6. HI, thanks for your interesting comments on the National Spelling Bee. Great to hear from the …pronouncer!
    If your teacher can download my app, Version 3 has just come, they might find that of some help?
    Best wishes

  7. Khan says:

    I will link them to the blog and tell them to get whatever they can from it. =) Thank you.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s